On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 00:55:36 -0600 (CST) Vidiot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been noticing this for a while now and it is damn annoying. The > ls command traverses symbolic links if the symbolic link is used as > the filename given to ls. For example, if I do: > > ls -laG sym_filename > > and sym_filename points to a directory named /usr/symlinkname, the > contents of /usr/symlinkname is displayed instead of displaying > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 brown 16 Sep 15 02:24 sym_filename -> > /usr/symlinkname Not here. It shows the symlink and to what it is pointing. -- It's not a bug, it's tradition! -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
