rm -f xxx -f for force.
/Søren >-- Original Message -- >From: Mi Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: How to delete write-protected file >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:44:49 -0600 > > >I have files created by Apache, so they are showing "write protected" to > >other users. When I type in "rm xxx", I will be prompted for a >confirmation for each file. How do I avoid getting these "Yes/No questions"? > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>You can reach the person managing the list at >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..." >> >> >>Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: Offtopic question (Rudolf) >> 2. RE: How to run X over SSH? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >> 3. RE: touch modifies read-only files ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >> 4. RE: Help Setting Up BIND on Redhat. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >> 5. Autologin on redhat edition ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >> 6. Re: Autologin on redhat edition (Ashley Kitson) >> 7. RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature? (Burke, Thomas G.) >> 8. ADSL with Earthlink over Covad using PPPoE (Burke, Thomas G.) >> 9. Re: Autologin on redhat edition (Duncan Hill) >> 10. RE: Redhat file server using W2K user id's (Turner, John) >> 11. Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature? (Sander Steffann) >> 12. RE: Compile modules for Apache V2 (Turner, John) >> 13. RE: ADSL with Earthlink over Covad using PPPoE (Ferguson, Michael) >> >>--__--__-- >> >>Message: 1 >>From: "Rudolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: Re: Offtopic question >>Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 03:53:39 -0500 >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Many Thanks to All. >>I will inform you in case of this project starts, and hope you will also >>participate in it. >> >>Regards >>Rudolf >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 5:30 PM >>Subject: Re: Offtopic question >> >> >> >> >>>Couldn't you have just sent this link: >>> >>> http://www.centile.com/briefs/Enterprise-ipbx-product-brief.pdf >>> >>>That attachment went to several thousand people, most of whom had no >>>interest in it, and some of whom have metered Internet access. >>> >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Terry Broadbent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Date: Friday, January 24, 2003 17:19 >>>Subject: RE: Offtopic question >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>I sell a VOIP product that will do exactly what you need. Attached is >>>>the product information. >>>> >>>> >>>[snip] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>redhat-list mailing list >>>unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe >>>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>--__--__-- >> >>Message: 2 >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: RE: How to run X over SSH? >>Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 19:34:33 +1000 >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Leo Huang <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thursday, 30 January 2003 >>17:46: >> >> >> >>>>From Cameron's response, It seems I have to install >>>> >>>> >>>something on my local >>>machines?? >>> >>>Leo >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>Leo, >> I think you should describe what X programs you want to run and why >>you need to tunnel the X. Perhaps there are other ways of doing it. >>for example VNC might be suitable. >> >>If you have a slow connection somewhere in between your client and >>server then it won't be a very pleasant experience, >>although X will generally be faster than VNC. >> >>If you are going to go the trouble of installing cygwin to get the >>XFree-86 server then you might find you can get some of the X >>applications to run directly on the PC (possibly still as X clients). >> >>You could try the demo version of X-Win32 from www.starnet.com. >> >>Cameron. >> >> >> >> >>--__--__-- >> >>Message: 3 >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: RE: touch modifies read-only files >>Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:24:10 +1000 >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>nate <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thursday, 30 January 2003 18:46: >> >> >> >>>Dan Bar Dov said: >>> >>> >>>>If the file is owned by the user, touch will modify its >>>>last-mod-time. This is contrary to my understanding that a read only >>>>file cannot be modified (unless I insist as in rm -f) >>>> >>>>Is this standard on all Unixes? >>>> >>>> >>>[snip]... >>>I am not sure if this is standard, but you shouldn't rely on this >>>sort of test with touch. I don't feel like powering up my solaris >>>machines but my FreeBSD 4.7 system shows the same behavior. My >>>RS/6000 and SGI Indy aren't plugged in either. >>> >>>nate >>> >>> >> >> >>Same on Solaris. >> >>If you think about it, the times are in the inode, not the file. >>Blocking write permissions to a file cannot also block write permission >>to the inode, because that is where the permissions are stored - but >>you don't have general access to the inodes anyway. >> >>Whether the file is actually writable or not, >>touch is still just lying about it being modified. It does >>not actually modify it. >> >>I then started trying to remember how touch works - >>the system call it uses is utime(2), so you can read the man page >>on the defined permissions for modification. I tried on the Solaris >>man page but it left me too confused to repeat here. >>I think they meant it is ok if >>you are effectively root, or the owner, or have write permission. >>Different permissions might apply if you are trying >>to set another time in the past or the future. >>I presume there's a Posix standard for it. Somewhere. >> >>Cameron. >> >> >> >> >>--__--__-- >> >>Message: 4 >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: RE: Help Setting Up BIND on Redhat. >>Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:44:46 +1000 >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Tasha Smith <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thursday, 30 January >>2003 19:10: >> >> >> >>>Hiii, >>> >>>Im trying to set-up BIND on my LAN. I have one Redhat machine >>>acting as a <Firewall, Router, DNS Server> and 2 WINDOWS >>>machines behind it. Right now the windows machines are >>>configured to have my ISP DNS as there Primary DNS server but >>>i want my Linux machine to act as the DNS server. >>> >>>#####Redhat 7.3 (2.4.20), Bind-9.2.2rc1####### >>> >>>Soo i think i want to set-up a forwarding name server. >>> >>>Soo this is what i got soo far: i created the file called >>>/etc/named.conf and in it is: >>> >>>options { >>>directory "/var/named"; >>>forwarders { <IP address of forwarder>; }; >>>forward only; >>>}; >>> >>>I ran named-checkconf and no errors. >>> >>>I have also created a /var/named <---directory! Now im >>>confused on the next steps i need after this can someone >>>help....And do i need more stuff in my /etc/named.conf file? Thanks >>>guys >>> >>> >>> >> >>I also have in named.conf: >> listen-on { >> 127.0.0.1; >> 192.168.0.1; -- address of internal lan eth i/f >> }; >> >>to make sure it ignores the outside world (and my mistakes are >>less likely to escape). >> >>Not sure about the rest, because I created a bogus internal domain >>and populated it with my home PCs IP addresses. Which seemed like a >>fun thing at the time (did I say that?) but in the end was a bit >>overkill. The kids know the IP numbers of all the machines anyway. >>The DNS howto (www.tldp.org) I think was what I mainly followed. >> >>Cameron. >> >> >> >> >>--__--__-- >> >>Message: 5 >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Autologin on redhat edition >>Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:22:34 +0100 >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Hi everyone, >>I have a computer with Redhat 8.0 and just one user. I would like to start >>automatically a session X without entering the user's name and password. >>Does someone know how to do that? >> >>Thanks >> >>Thierry >> >> >> >> >> >>--__--__-- >> >>Message: 6 >>From: "Ashley Kitson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: Re: Autologin on redhat edition >>Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:32:59 -0000 >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Thierry >> >>edit the /etc/initab file (as root) and change the >> >>id:3:initdefault: >> >>line to read >> >>id:5:initdefault: >> >>Prior to this you will see a reminder of the different runlevel settings. >I >>assume 5 is X11 on yours. However you may want to lay off doing this until >>you are totally sure that you have your system bedded down as if you get >a >>hang in X11 then you may not be able to fix it in text mode without a >>re-install (I'm a newby and it happened to me!!) >> >>Kind Regards >>Mr Ashley Kitson >> >>www.bbcb.co.uk >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:22 PM >>Subject: Autologin on redhat edition >> >> >> >> >>>Hi everyone, >>>I have a computer with Redhat 8.0 and just one user. I would like to start >>>automatically a session X without entering the user's name and password. >>>Does someone know how to do that? >>> >>>Thanks >>> >>>Thierry >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>redhat-list mailing list >>>unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe >>>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>--__--__-- >> >>Message: 7 >>From: "Burke, Thomas G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature? >>Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 04:45:32 -0800 >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand >>this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. >> >>------_=_NextPart_001_01C2C85D.7A35B8D0 >>Content-Type: text/plain; >> charset="iso-8859-1" >> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >>Be sure to change the osirusoft.com entry. It is incorrect, and will >>cause everything sent to your machine to be rejected. This is stated >>on their website. I think is should be osirusoft.net, but I wouldn't >>swear to it. >> >>- -----Original Message----- >>From: Toto Gamez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:07 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Sendmail anti-spam feature? >> >> >>I tried to activate the sendmail anti spam. My sendamil.mc is at >>/etc/mail and my senmail.cf file is at /etc. whn i issued "m4 >>/etc/sendmail.mc > /etc/sendmail.cf" i got an error "m4: >>/etc/sendmail.mc: No such file or directory". I chang my command to >>"m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > /etc/sendmail.cf" but I also got this >>error message "/etc/mail/sendmail.mc:11: m4: Cannot open >>/usr/lib/sendmail-cf/m4/cf.m4: No such file or directory" What should >>I do next? >> >>I just added this to my sendmail.mc file: >> >>FEATURE(`dnsbl',`relays.osirusoft.com')dnl >>FEATURE(`dnsbl',`relays.ordb.org')dnl >>FEATURE(`dnsbl',`list.dsbl.org')dnl >>FEATURE(`dnsbl',`dnsbl.sorbs.net')dnl >> >>Do I also have to include this?: >> >>FEATURE(`delay_check')dnl >> >> >>Please help >> >>Regards, >>Toto >> >> >> >> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3 >> >>iQA/AwUBPjkePtPjBkUEZx5AEQIJhwCcDIpZo0JKR/oYY2UNAFQ1mPAmZ24AoMHX >>LNp9uMrlubMtv3MxzyZ8pdUo >>=jnBC >>-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >>------_=_NextPart_001_01C2C85D.7A35B8D0 >>Content-Type: text/html; >> charset="iso-8859-1" >> >><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> >><HTML> >><HEAD> >><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> >><META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12"> >><TITLE>RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?</TITLE> >></HEAD> >><BODY> >> >><P><FONT SIZE=2>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>Hash: SHA1</FONT> >></P> >> >><P><FONT SIZE=2>Be sure to change the osirusoft.com entry. It is incorrect, >and will</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>cause everything sent to your machine to be rejected. >This is stated</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>on their website. I think is should be osirusoft.net, >but I wouldn't</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>swear to it.</FONT> >></P> >> >><P><FONT SIZE=2>- -----Original Message-----</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Toto Gamez [<A >HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>]</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:07 PM</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: Sendmail anti-spam feature?</FONT> >></P> >><BR> >> >><P><FONT SIZE=2>I tried to activate the sendmail anti spam. My sendamil.mc >is at</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>/etc/mail and my senmail.cf file is at /etc. whn i issued >"m4</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>/etc/sendmail.mc > /etc/sendmail.cf" i got an error >"m4:</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>/etc/sendmail.mc: No such file or directory". I chang >my command to</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>"m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > /etc/sendmail.cf" >but I also got this</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>error message "/etc/mail/sendmail.mc:11: m4: Cannot >open</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>/usr/lib/sendmail-cf/m4/cf.m4: No such file or directory" >What should</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>I do next?</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>I just added this to my sendmail.mc file:</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>FEATURE(`dnsbl',`relays.osirusoft.com')dnl</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>FEATURE(`dnsbl',`relays.ordb.org')dnl</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>FEATURE(`dnsbl',`list.dsbl.org')dnl</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>FEATURE(`dnsbl',`dnsbl.sorbs.net')dnl</FONT> >></P> >> >><P><FONT SIZE=2>Do I also have to include this?:</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>FEATURE(`delay_check')dnl</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>Please help</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>Regards,</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>Toto</FONT> >></P> >> >><P><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT> >></P> >><BR> >> >><P><FONT SIZE=2>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3</FONT> >></P> >> >><P><FONT >SIZE=2>iQA/AwUBPjkePtPjBkUEZx5AEQIJhwCcDIpZo0JKR/oYY2UNAFQ1mPAmZ24AoMHX</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>LNp9uMrlubMtv3MxzyZ8pdUo</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>=jnBC</FONT> >><BR><FONT SIZE=2>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</FONT> >></P> >> >></BODY> >></HTML> >>------_=_NextPart_001_01C2C85D.7A35B8D0-- >> >> >> >> >>--__--__-- >> >>Message: 8 >>From: "Burke, Thomas G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: ADSL with Earthlink over Covad using PPPoE >>Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 05:05:00 -0800 >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >>Hey gang, >> >> We discussed this some in the recent past, but they are switching my >>service over today, so I have some questions. >> >> I'm using a Telocity (now DirecTV, soon to be nobody) ADSL "modem", >>and have opted to try to make it work with their system, rather than >>spending the $26 to get their modem shipped to me (what can I say, >>I'm cheap)... >> >> I've already downloaded roaring penguin, & it is ready for >>installation. >> >> 1) I have a static IP, but do not know what it is. >> 2) I am currently configured for DHCP ethx configuration >> >> 1st question - has anyone else made this swithc? What I'm getting >>at is this -"did Telocity/DirecTV use PPPoE & their modem handled it, >>so I should just need to reset the modem & maybe it will work?" >> >> 2nd question - if the 1st quenstions' answer is "no," what are the >>steps I need to do to setup roaring penguin - yes, I know, RTFM, but >>I'm looking for some insight, here.... >> >> I think the big problem I have is going to be setting up my IP >>address when I don't even know it. I understand that the modem that >>Earthlink would ship me handles the PPPoE conversion itself & uses >>DHCP for my machines connection to it - Is this true? - THey call >>their modem a Bridged Ethernet ADSL Modem (I think it's a two-wire >>job). >> >> 3rd question - what changes do I need to make to my startup scripts >>(esp. for my ethernet *e.g. ifup, etc.*), to get the whole mess to >>work? >> >> Thanks, >> Tom >> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3 >> >>iQA/AwUBPjkizdPjBkUEZx5AEQKsDgCdG/PV9kTp2aIybczLAmaSP5bFRCAAn0Gy >>7o1ZsxxXC+TVMj9nv8e7pTKf >>=bAnL >>-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> >> >>--__--__-- >> >>Message: 9 >>Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:07:02 +0000 >>From: Duncan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: Autologin on redhat edition >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >>>Hi everyone, >>>I have a computer with Redhat 8.0 and just one user. I would like to start >>>automatically a session X without entering the user's name and password. >>>Does someone know how to do that? >>> >>> >> >>Autologin in X is controlled by the [G|K|X]DM program. GDM (the Gnome >>login handler) and I think KDM (KDE version) both allow you to pick a >>user as the default user to login automatically as. >> >> >> >> >> >>--__--__-- >> >>Message: 10 >>From: "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: RE: Redhat file server using W2K user id's >>Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 08:14:51 -0500 >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >>http://www.samba.org >> >>John >> >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: DuSTiN KRySaK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:51 AM >>>To: Redhat Mailing List >>>Subject: Redhat file server using W2K user id's >>> >>> >>>Hi there... I have a win2000 network, and want to start to >>>get away from >>>that... And I need a simple file server, and I was hoping to >>>have it run >>>RH8... Now - I was wondering.. Was it possible to share out a >>>folder on the >>>RH box, but use the user id's from my (w2K) Active Directory? >>>I do not want >>>to have to maintain 2 sets of user id's.... >>> >>> >>> >>>Dustin >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>redhat-list mailing list >>>unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe >>>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>--__--__-- >> >>Message: 11 >>From: "Sander Steffann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature? >>Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:19:25 +0100 >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?Hi, >> >> >> >>>Be sure to change the osirusoft.com entry. It is incorrect, and will >>>cause everything sent to your machine to be rejected. This is stated >>>on their website. I think is should be osirusoft.net, but I wouldn't >>>swear to it. >>> >>> >> >>I don't know where you heard this, but relays.osirusoft.com is the official >>name for the Osirusoft blacklists... >> >>Sander. >> >> >> >> >> >>--__--__-- >> >>Message: 12 >>From: "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: RE: Compile modules for Apache V2 >>Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 08:20:36 -0500 >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >>I've never used "--with-layout=RedHat", so I don't know exactly what that >>does. Typically, configure takes an argument like "--with-prefix=/SOME/DIR" >>where /SOME/DIR is where you want files to go, like /usr/local/apache. >> >>You might want to run find and check to see if there are multiple httpd >>files on your drive: >> >>find / -name httpd -print >> >>If there are others besides /usr/bin/httpd, run them with -V to see if any >>of them are .44...that will help you start to track down where your files >>went. You can also run find with a time option to find all the files >>created/modified within the last 24 hours, which would help you track down >>all of the files that are new in your root directory. Be careful deleting >>files from /, though. >> >>John >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: DuSTiN KRySaK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:25 AM >>>To: Redhat Mailing List >>>Subject: Re: Compile modules for Apache V2 >>> >>> >>>Ok, so I tried compiling Apache this evening, and I never got >>>any errors, >>>BUT.... It seems as though it has installed into the root of >>>the drive, >>>There are all these files there now like... "httpd.conf" and >>>"httpd-2.0.40-pod.patch", etc etc.... >>> >>> >>>And at the command line when I run /usr/bin/httpd -V it still >>>shows as being >>>V 2.0.40 instead of V 2.0.44... >>> >>>What I ran for commands to create the package were... >>> >>> >>>./configure --enable-module=so --enable-ssl --with-layout=RedHat >>> >>> >>>I was hoping this wopuld compile and install over my previous >>>version of >>>Apache... >>> >>> >>>Then I ran: >>> >>>make >>> >>> >>>then: >>> >>>make install >>> >>>Can anyone see where I went wrong? I am just trying to >>>upgrade my Apach >>>install from 2.0.40 to 2.0.44 with all the same options and >>>modules in the >>>same location.... And to have the GUI work too. >>> >>> >>>Thanks in advance! >>> >>> >>>Dustin >>> >>> >>> >>>On 1/28/03 11:22 PM, "DuSTiN KRySaK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>spit this out onto >>>my computer screen: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hi there, I need to compile Apache again so that I can hopefully get >>>>coldfusion mx to work with my version of redhat (V8)... At >>>> >>>> >>>any rate, I am >>> >>> >>>>pretty new to Linux, and I was wondering which Apache >>>> >>>> >>>modules I should >>> >>> >>>>include when I compile apache? I know it all depends on >>>> >>>> >>>what I want my >>> >>> >>>>server to be able to do... I just want to know what is >>>> >>>> >>>considered "the >>> >>> >>>>norm". >>>> >>>> >>> >>>-- >>>redhat-list mailing list >>>unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe >>>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>--__--__-- >> >>Message: 13 >>From: "Ferguson, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: RE: ADSL with Earthlink over Covad using PPPoE >>Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 08:30:21 -0500 >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Telocity gave the modem 1 IP address 216.222.176.234 and the Computer >>another 216.222.176.233 >>You might first have to configure the telocity modem http://10.5.2.1 or >>something like that. >>That's all I can remember. I switched to Comcast cable(fiber) and it is >>blaaaazing fast. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Burke, Thomas G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:05 AM >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >>Subject: ADSL with Earthlink over Covad using PPPoE >> >> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >>Hey gang, >> >> We discussed this some in the recent past, but they are switching my >>service over today, so I have some questions. >> >> I'm using a Telocity (now DirecTV, soon to be nobody) ADSL "modem", >>and have opted to try to make it work with their system, rather than >>spending the $26 to get their modem shipped to me (what can I say, I'm >>cheap)... >> >> I've already downloaded roaring penguin, & it is ready for >>installation. >> >> 1) I have a static IP, but do not know what it is. >> 2) I am currently configured for DHCP ethx configuration >> >> 1st question - has anyone else made this swithc? What I'm getting >>at is this -"did Telocity/DirecTV use PPPoE & their modem handled it, so >I >>should just need to reset the modem & maybe it will work?" >> >> 2nd question - if the 1st quenstions' answer is "no," what are the >>steps I need to do to setup roaring penguin - yes, I know, RTFM, but I'm >>looking for some insight, here.... >> >> I think the big problem I have is going to be setting up my IP >>address when I don't even know it. I understand that the modem that >>Earthlink would ship me handles the PPPoE conversion itself & uses DHCP >for >>my machines connection to it - Is this true? - THey call their modem a >>Bridged Ethernet ADSL Modem (I think it's a two-wire job). >> >> 3rd question - what changes do I need to make to my startup scripts >>(esp. for my ethernet *e.g. ifup, etc.*), to get the whole mess to work? >> >> Thanks, >> Tom >> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3 >> >>iQA/AwUBPjkizdPjBkUEZx5AEQKsDgCdG/PV9kTp2aIybczLAmaSP5bFRCAAn0Gy >>7o1ZsxxXC+TVMj9nv8e7pTKf >>=bAnL >>-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Redhat-install-list mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list >>To Unsubscribe Go To ABOVE URL or send a message to: >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: unsubscribe >> >> >> >> >> >>--__--__-- >> >>__ >>redhat-list mailing list >>Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe >>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >> >> >>End of redhat-list Digest >> >> > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
