> On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 12:28:02PM -0500 or thereabouts, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > In my opinion, after looking and using a few, there is only one, and that > is dnscache, which can be installed alone. It is part of the djbdns > programs. It is fast, lightweight, totally secure, far better than BIND, > which is monolithic in terms of having both DNS and Cache together. You > will not be sorry. I will never go back to BIND for content or caching > servers. If you use a content server, tinydns is faster (over 5000 queries > per second), more secure also, *much easier* to set up, etc.
I've been using dnscache on my Linux workstation, and I can certainly vouch for it's speed. :) One thing that confuses me though, is whether tinydns uses the same cache that dnscache uses. Do I have to use dnscache along with tinydns? -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
