On Fri, 20 Mar 1998, Tim Larkins (EUKSHEL1PO) wrote:
> I know that I did get an answer to this question.. but I'm supprised that I
> wasn't swamped by people either telling me that either a) there are official
> rpm's of 2.0.33 out there.. or b) Just use the plain tar.gz kernels as
> there is no difference (and that thing in the Awedrv setup was a one off
> oddity)...
>
> Whats RH's offical stance on kernel upgrades? Are we supposed to stick with
> 2.0.32 until they release an upgrade to 2.0.33? Or is RH Hurricane only
> ever going to be 2.0.32 and we're either stuck with it or should go else
> where and face the consequences?
Red Hat only issues kernel upgrades when these are required to fix
serious bugs or security problems.
Robert Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manage, Supprt Services
Red Hat Software Inc. Phone: +1-919-547-0012 Fax: +1-919-547-0024
4201 Research Commons Suite 100, 79 TW Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park,
NC 27709, USA
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
