On Sat, Jun 13, 1998 at 11:32:49PM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Fishwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Saturday, June 13, 1998 10:59 PM
> Subject: Re: HTML-formatted mail
> 
> 
> >Hmm.. I'd have to disagree here...  In my opinion, HTML should *never*
> >have been integrated with email.  Email should always have been a text
> >only medium rather than all this colour and font crap that people are
> >putting in with it...
> 
> 
> And yet, you used asterixes as the usual crude workaround to the lack of

[sarcastic mode on]
What's an "asterix" ?? Do you mean: "asterisk" ??
[sarcastic mode off]

Sorry, I couldn't resist!

> Without some form of markup language, we have to resort to crude workarounds
> such as asterixes, all-caps, and the extremely ugly "stick an underbar
> before and after".

don't NEED any of that stuff. MIME already defines a way to send and
interpret similar encodings using what is called "enriched/text". The
'mutt' mailer properly flags it as a mime-type document and interprets
it as such when reading the document. Any other mail tool that correctly
implements all the mime types should also do so. enriched/text supports
colors, bold, dim, underline, etc., so what more do you need for e-mail?

So, as the original poster meant/said:

        Don't need no steenking HTML in our e-mail!

Fred
-- 
---- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------
                      The eyes of the Lord are everywhere, 
                    keeping watch on the wicked and the good.
----------------------------- Proverbs 15:3 (niv) -----------------------------


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
         To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Reply via email to