On Sat, Jun 13, 1998 at 11:32:49PM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Fishwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Saturday, June 13, 1998 10:59 PM
> Subject: Re: HTML-formatted mail
>
>
> >Hmm.. I'd have to disagree here... In my opinion, HTML should *never*
> >have been integrated with email. Email should always have been a text
> >only medium rather than all this colour and font crap that people are
> >putting in with it...
>
>
> And yet, you used asterixes as the usual crude workaround to the lack of
[sarcastic mode on]
What's an "asterix" ?? Do you mean: "asterisk" ??
[sarcastic mode off]
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
> Without some form of markup language, we have to resort to crude workarounds
> such as asterixes, all-caps, and the extremely ugly "stick an underbar
> before and after".
don't NEED any of that stuff. MIME already defines a way to send and
interpret similar encodings using what is called "enriched/text". The
'mutt' mailer properly flags it as a mime-type document and interprets
it as such when reading the document. Any other mail tool that correctly
implements all the mime types should also do so. enriched/text supports
colors, bold, dim, underline, etc., so what more do you need for e-mail?
So, as the original poster meant/said:
Don't need no steenking HTML in our e-mail!
Fred
--
---- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------
The eyes of the Lord are everywhere,
keeping watch on the wicked and the good.
----------------------------- Proverbs 15:3 (niv) -----------------------------
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.