I'm a little surprised that an RB plugin developer doesn't even read the Readme's and release notifications for each RB release. Is this an attempt to lobby for a new feature ?
No is the answer - although there is at least one FR in the system about this. I think the issue is what form of generics would one want ?, the "runtime" C# way, or the compile-time C++ way ?. My preference would be compile time - since as RB is a natively compiled language it should always be aiming for near-C++ level performance, not a script/dynamic interpreted language type performance. Personally there are other features I would rather like to see first, the ability to build DLLs and dylibs etc being top of the list. ( last time I looked it had around 60 votes on the F.R. For it ) On 9/4/07 12:26, "Theodore H. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So does RB 2007 support templating or some form of genericity yet? > > -- > http://elfdata.com/plugin/ > "String processing, done right" > > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > Regards, Dan _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
