Hi Otto, I'm the software developer behind rdiffweb and Minarca (with a new release to be coming soon with self-hosted feature). While I have not contribute alot to rdiff-backup, I want to contribute to add new feature to make rdiffweb and Minarca better and faster. As of now, it's relatively hard for me: 1. Pull request are not merged 2. Many patches release 10 year ago are still not in master ! 3. I don't see any automated build put in place for master. I recently build a CICD pipeline on my own to fix a bug on Windows. https://git.patrikdufresne.com/pdsl/rdiff-backup-build
From my understanding sol1 was taking the maintainer-ship of the project, they have done some preliminary work, but nothing serious in term of release or pull request. Which is a bit disappointing. If we plan to have yet another maintainer, I would love if we can avoid making the same mistake again. rdiff-backup is an opensource project and many people from various companies (including mine) have insensitive to work on it. People are coming and leaving relatively fast and moving everything to a different repository every time doesnt' seams to be the solution. I would recommend to create a new repository which is not related to any companies. Let name it "rdiff-backup". So basically, something acessible from https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup or similar. And let have people from various place be the maintainers with a code review process or something similar. That should allow everyone to have a relatively stable place where to look for the rdiff-backup source code instead of guessing the branches as of today. Would also love to see the website taken down and migrated to github wiki or github pages. As of now, I'm relatively busy working on Minarca and rdifweb. I have no time to work on rdiff-backup but I will soon turn my attention on it. Before moving forward with this, I would appreciate to have feedback from sol1. After all they are the maintainer today. -- Patrik Dufresne Service Logiciel inc. http://www.patrikdufresne.com <http://patrikdufresne.com/>/ 514-971-6442 130 rue Doris St-Colomban, QC J5K 1T9 On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:10 PM Dale E. Qualls <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed and "starred". > > > > > > > [http://images.pattishall.com/images/pattishalllogo.jpg] > > Dale E. Qualls > Director of Information Technology > Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP > 200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2900 > Chicago, IL 60606-5896 > Direct: (312) 554-7979 Main: (312) 554-8000 Fax: (312) 554-8015 > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> www.pattishall.com< > http://www.pattishall.com> Follow us on Twitter< > http://www.twitter.com/Pattishall> > > > > [http://images.pattishall.com/images/25pixelimage.gif] [ > http://images.pattishall.com/images/25pixelimage.gif] [ > http://images.pattishall.com/images/blf-badge.jpg] [ > http://images.pattishall.com/images/25pixelimage.gif] Pattishall Ranks > GOLD in the United States and in Illinois in the prestigious > WTR 1000 [http://images.pattishall.com/images/25pixelimage.gif] [ > http://images.pattishall.com/images/2014chambers-65.jpg] [ > http://images.pattishall.com/images/25pixelimage.gif] [ > http://images.pattishall.com/images/2013gototop500.jpg] > > ________________________________ > The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential > information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. You may > not forward this message or any attachments without the permission of the > sender. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply > to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. > Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender > and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic > signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the > message. > ________________________________ > From: rdiff-backup-users [mailto:rdiff-backup-users-bounces+deq= > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Dominic Raferd > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 12:06 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Future of rdiff-backup: Python 3 > migration and project maintainership in general > > > External email, exercise caution. > > > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, 17:37 Otto Kekäläinen, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > There has not been any new releases of rdiff-backup since 2009. If the > > original maintainer does not intend to work on this project, could I > > please be allowed to take over? > > > > I am a Debian Developer and active in multiple open source projects. > > Our company supports many open source projects (seravo.com/opensource< > http://seravo.com/opensource>) > > and since we also use rdiff-backup, I could get some funding and man > > power to for example complete the Python3 migration. I know Python > > well and have recently contributed Python code to AppArmor upstream, > > so I think I am technically competent. With 20 years of open source > > experience I believe I can be a good steward this project. > > > > Rdiff-backup is marked for autoremoval from Debian on August 8th. I > > hope we could get some responses and activity on this soon so I have a > > chance to save rdiff-backup in Debian. > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rdiff-backup< > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rdiff-backup> > > > > That do you think? > > > > If you are in favor of this please let me know by starring > > https://github.com/Seravo/rdiff-backup< > https://github.com/Seravo/rdiff-backup> > > > > If I get more than 5 stars I will begin the Python 3 migration and > > also pulling in the best commits from the existing forks that have had > > most activity: > > - https://github.com/ericzolf/rdiff-backup< > https://github.com/ericzolf/rdiff-backup> > > - https://github.com/ardovm/rdiff-backup< > https://github.com/ardovm/rdiff-backup> > > - https://github.com/hosting90/rdiff-backup< > https://github.com/hosting90/rdiff-backup> > > - https://github.com/orangenschalen/rdiff-backup< > https://github.com/orangenschalen/rdiff-backup> > > (see https://github.com/sol1/rdiff-backup/network< > https://github.com/sol1/rdiff-backup/network>) > > > > > > - Otto > > > > Sounds great to me. Rdiff- backup remains a really useful tool so I would > welcome it being given a new lease of life. > > > > _______________________________________________ > rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users< > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users> > Wiki URL: > http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki< > http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users > Wiki URL: > http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki _______________________________________________ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
