Lol I read that page and still didn't get it. Any opinion for a potential workaround?
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 3:08 PM Sorawee Porncharoenwase <[email protected]> wrote: > > I had this exact same question when I looked at the RacketScript issue lol. > > The answer is https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/numbers.html: > > a complex number with an exact zero imaginary part is a real number. > > Since 0.0 is not exact, 0.0i is not a real number. > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:59 AM Stephen Chang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> In the following, why is the first considered a real number but the >> second considered not real >> >> > (real? 0.0+0i) >> #t >> > (real? 0.0+0.0i) >> #f >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Racket Users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAFfiA1%2BYygGrLH2rtwby8AWg7Edyvq-tzmANTNypq5Rqd-eXFw%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAFfiA1%2B3yRzzh%3DKhcOddt0geMezNsxQGHqzwGTYbZjLekUQ8kQ%40mail.gmail.com.
