On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:44:42 -0700 (PDT), Ryan Kramer <[email protected]> wrote:
> : >The other feature of let++ is that it also supports let-values. (Having to >nest "let, then let-values, then let again" was another reason my code >would get too indented for my taste.) > : Possibly a stupid question, but ... What causes you to /have to/ 'nest "let, then let-values, then let again"'? Assuming no intervening body code, a single let*-values could cover all of it (with the same semantics). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/pjd1ngddbcqpak5ke8720uddit5h254vmk%404ax.com.
