Hi, I wrote myself this little function:
(define (hash->ordered-list h) (hash-map h cons #t)) which uses the try-order? argument of hash-map. Is there a reason for hash->list not have an optional argument try-order? Or perhaps having such a standalone function would be better? I was planning to submit a patch, but then I thought I may be missing something. - Sergiu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/06052379-819d-45e1-8ea8-5dcced59d557n%40googlegroups.com.
