I've adjusted pkgs.racket-lang.org to fix a problem with fetching the
pkg-build status from pkg-build.racket-lang.org. That is, packages were
being built and documentation was incorporated into
docs.racket-lang.org, but pkgs.racket-lang.org wasn't reflecting that.

(I didn't do more than try to fix this specific problem, though.)

At Fri, 8 Oct 2021 10:40:31 -0700, Siddhartha Kasivajhula wrote:
> Looks like the try-catch package docs still aren't showing up
> <https://pkgd.racket-lang.org/pkgn/package/try-catch>.
> 
> This might be a broader issue with the package index and docs, since I just
> renamed one of my packages that already had docs, and the docs now no
> longer exist on the package index (it says "this package needs
> documentation"). I think this is because the package now reflects as a new
> package and so runs afoul of whatever issue appears to be afflicting new
> arrivals.
> 
> I checked the "New Releases" section of the latest issue of Racket News
> <https://racket-news.com/2021/10/racket-news-issue-54.html#newreleases> to
> validate whether new packages are especially affected, and of the packages
> listed there, a majority of them include scribble docs that we can see
> listed in the package modules, but the docs show up for none of them:
> 
> https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/in-out-logged
> https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/libansilove
> https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/pprint-compact
> https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/codepoint
> https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/fmt
> https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/pareto-frontier
> https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/majordomo2
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:01 AM David Storrs <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Cool, thanks.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:23 AM Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> At Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:20:47 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:57 AM Matthew Flatt <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > At Wed, 29 Sep 2021 02:27:53 +0000, Philip McGrath wrote:
> >> > > > I haven't tried `raco setup` to look at its output, but one possible
> >> > > > improvement would be for whatever code complains about the "invalid
> >> > > `deps'
> >> > > > specification" to always report the invalid file's path.
> >> > >
> >> > > I've pushed that addition.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > Thanks, Matthew.  Is this a "download Racket 8.2" thing or an "update
> >> from
> >> > github" thing?
> >>
> >> The improvement is only in the GitHub repo right now. So, updating from
> >> GitHub gets it now, it will also be part of the next round of
> >> snapshots, and then it will be part of the upcoming v8.3 release.
> >>
> >>
> >> Matthew
> >>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Racket Users" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to [email protected].
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> > 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAE8gKoegBUGVbfmguydZwaVBWgrNOJWJ
> 3CmxTvShROR4-dpvJw%40mail.gmail.com
> > 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAE8gKoegBUGVbfmguydZwaVBWgrNOJW
> J3CmxTvShROR4-dpvJw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> > .
> >

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20211008164839.3cc%40sirmail.smtps.cs.utah.edu.

Reply via email to