> A shortcut to answering my question would be to tell me that `with-quasisyntax` in the following paste already exists: http://pasterack.org/pastes/48885
Without taking a detailed look, is there anything about with-quasisyntax that with-syntax <https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/stx-patterns.html#%28form._%28%28lib._racket%2Fprivate%2Fstxcase-scheme..rkt%29._with-syntax%29%29> (https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/stx-patterns.html#%28form._%28%28lib._racket%2Fprivate%2Fstxcase-scheme..rkt%29._with-syntax%29%29) doesn't do? I would also highly recommend syntax-parse and it's various abstractions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/5c89cbd3-0b4a-4d60-ab23-6456225b4a80n%40googlegroups.com.
