D. Ben Knoble
> 1) It wasn’t immediately clear to me that the links were the names of > channels. It seems painfully obvious to me now, but perhaps it’s worth > starting all the names with hashes? Great idea, thanks. > 2) Clicking on the channel name “general” appears to melt down somehow, > presumably because the page is really really really big. Is pagination near > the top of most-desired-new-features? Yeah, this is one of my top priorities. I’m thinking I’ll break it down by date. But I may want to rewrite the static generation in Racket first (to get it off Ruby + Jekyll, which may be unfamiliar to the community). > Again, I think it’s great that you’re doing this! Thanks :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/A2CF171A-71F5-4C75-9705-53A0F1419F00%40gmail.com.
