Yep, I think that’s probably on the money. I guess this is really a classic 
example of the problem with writing code using internet search.

Many thanks!

> On May 7, 2021, at 4:38 PM, Ben Greenman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 5/7/21, Shu-Hung You <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Not that I have any idea of what's going on, but interestingly, Typed
>> Racket's second ->* example has (1)(3)(4). The use of list* may be
>> possible if one follows the type (List* String Natural x) in the
>> example.
>> 
>> https://docs.racket-lang.org/ts-reference/type-ref.html?#%28form._%28%28lib._typed-racket%2Fbase-env%2Fbase-types-extra..rkt%29._-~3e%2A%29%29
>> 
>> Shu-Hung
> 
> +1, that example in the docs looks _very_ similar to the student code
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAFUu9R4SJ7OisUeH5mFxGHpycrxhKYNFuSMLLgSzKCprt2aQWQ%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/36e88c8e-d2eb-43b5-8a8d-4144487fe347%40mtasv.net.

Reply via email to