On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 3:24 PM Dimaugh Silvestris <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 19:29, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It doesn't print that way because that wouldn't turn back into the original >> value when evaluated, since it's quoted. > > > Is there any other way? > If not, I might consider the possibility of having a struct type for each of > those ugens, but as I was saying in my first mail - is that sensible? That > would mean declaring ~600 struct types.
I'm not totally sure what you want. The goal of `print` is to print things in roughly a way that evaluating the printed result would produce the original value. Thus: Evaluating '(1 2 3) produces a 3-element list. Evaluating (sinosc: 1 2) sounds like it produces a structure that you want. But evaluating '(sinosc: 1 2) produces a 3-element list, not a structure. Thus, you don't want that as the printed result. That means that if you want to construct a pair of 0 and that structure, you need to use `cons` and not `quote`. If you want something else then you might need to construct the function provided for `gen:custom-write` directly, instead of using `make-constructor-style-printer`, but I still don't understand what you want the result to be. Sam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAK%3DHD%2BZfBAj7sTP83Ke965r8jXFKiPKNz5jfqv38NiergNHs5w%40mail.gmail.com.
