If you're just interested in the symbolic name "x", as opposed to the binding identifier, then see `syntax-local-name` or `syntax-local-infer-name`.
If you want the binding identifier, though, that's not available. Matthew At Sat, 27 Feb 2021 20:52:23 +0100, Jos Koot wrote: > Hi > > Consider: > (define-syntax (my-syntax stx) blah ...) > (define x (my-syntax blah ...) > > Is it possible for syntax my-syntax such as to know (at expansion time) > that is used as the expr of variable x in the expression of the definition? > Probably this is possible by redefining syntax define, but can I do it > without touching syntax define? > Thanks, Jos -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20210227125605.1b1%40sirmail.smtps.cs.utah.edu.
