On 25. 02. 21 10:01, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> Try integer-length.
>
> https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/generic-numbers.html?q=integer-length#%28def._%28%28quote._~23~25kernel%29._integer-length%29%29
Oh, I completely missed this one. Thank you!!!
>
> I don't know how it is implemented.
And now I do. On CS it is implemented in terms of fxlength, which is a
SW implementation, but still an order of magnitude faster than pure
Racket implementation.
So for my project, integer-length is an improvement I wanted. But the
general question remains. Instead of almost 100 instructions, it could
be just one or two. I'll look into it later on if no-one else finds it
interesting enough to fiddle with cpnanopass.ss and x86_64.ss ;-)
Cheers,
Dominik
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/ff8da3ed-3fee-5c4c-11f2-eecb086fd60e%40trustica.cz.
