I know about that. I asked why it was designed that way.

Sent from ProtonMail mobile

-------- Original Message --------
On Jan 3, 2021, 12:18 AM, Michael MacLeod wrote:

> There's an edge case of 'module' when only one form is provided which results 
> in that form being partially expanded to determine if such expansion would 
> lead to a #%plain-module-begin form. Otherwise (more than one form provided) 
> they are wrapped in #%module-begin with no partial expansion occurring.
>
> I think this might be causing the discrepancy you witnessed.
>
> From the docs (https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/module.html):
>
> If a single form is provided, then it is partially expanded in a module-begin 
> context. If the expansion leads to #%plain-module-begin, then the body of the 
> #%plain-module-begin is the body of the module. If partial expansion leads to 
> any other primitive form, then the form is wrapped with #%module-begin using 
> the lexical context of the module body; this identifier must be bound by the 
> initial module-path import, and its expansion must produce a 
> #%plain-module-begin to supply the module body. Finally, if multiple forms 
> are provided, they are wrapped with #%module-begin, as in the case where a 
> single form does not expand to #%plain-module-begin.
>
> (This response was adapted from one of my earlier replies to the mailing 
> list. Search racket-users for "perplexed by macro-expansion behavior near 
> #%module-begin" for more context).
>
> Best,
> Michael
>
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 8:26 PM Sage Gerard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Why does Racket handle modules with exactly one form differently?
>>
>> I ran into a bug where modules in my module language won't expand if the
>> modules have exactly one form, so I'm just curious.
>>
>> (Wild guess: It's Racket's way of checking for a shortcut to end expansion 
>> earlier)
>>
>> ~slg
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Racket Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> [https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/OVvZ0OK4_PfyvXCWfuvzDWBM5-ellmDvNmWchVmsCwAJb_rbSZkCkyraakcGsEMSCl2BsLsWtMXFhQcXY75IKhYiYYGQQEI7lVXLgGBbTCc%3D%40sagegerard.com](https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/OVvZ0OK4_PfyvXCWfuvzDWBM5-ellmDvNmWchVmsCwAJb_rbSZkCkyraakcGsEMSCl2BsLsWtMXFhQcXY75IKhYiYYGQQEI7lVXLgGBbTCc%3D%40sagegerard.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/KIgkgUi46OgANOqlif1csB0xaQQR2Z9I-jSlYmszXSGWsyFmt_XYpEPAzD7F_XguhZKv8OyU_EIA2pTxn8yvivQIj5hjyVzqgIpX9iNNs7o%3D%40sagegerard.com.

Reply via email to