I'm trying different ways to define a struct that has the same fields as its superstruct without adding any new field, but all I get is errors saying struct expects a list of fields. Something like: (struct edible (name grams) #:transparent) and then (struct fruit #:super edible #:transparent) or (struct fruit edible #transparent)
Of course I could simulate this behavior myself creating different structs and then writing accesors and predicates that would work on all of them, like: (define edible? (or? fruit? vegetable? fish?)) But I'd rather ask first if there's an in-built, more elegant way of doing this. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/8723311b-62d6-482e-a0ca-c020b32f5366n%40googlegroups.com.
