Hello,
I’m suspecting I’m getting a little turned around by phase levels and where
`require` comes in: it seems to be impossible to write a macro that expands
to a valid `require` (it doesn’t throw an error, but the functions aren’t
defined either). What am I missing? At what phase level does `require` do
its magic? And can I tap into this magic from within a macro?
An example to illustrate my point:
```
(define-syntax require-distributed ()
((_)
(require racket/place/distributed))) ; could be anything, really
(require-distributed) ; expands and runs fine, but no symbols :(
```
I know that this is somewhat of an odd thing to want, and I understand if
it’s not possible.
V
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/a49ab428-ae49-45ce-9d16-8a77d27f5a85n%40googlegroups.com.
