Oh, I got it. Thank you for the explanation! George Neuner <[email protected]> 於 2020年8月9日 週日 下午1:35寫道：
> > On 8/9/2020 1:20 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > One more thing which bothers me is if I put a (collect-garbage) in > > front of the testing, I got gc time: 0 if not I got gc time: 9. > > Why can't 1 gc reclaim all memory during execution while it can before > > executes? > > Those numbers show *time* spent working, not what was done. If you > collect before running your program, at that point little has been > allocated, and little or nothing has been freed, and so the GC has > little to do ... hence it spends '0' time doing it [zero meaning below > the resolution of the computer's clock]. Once your program starts > running, memory is being allocated and freed, and so a GC in the middle > or at the end has much more work to do. > > George > > > -- - sleepnova 呼叫小黃創辦人 & CEO -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CABa2-7PZ_Yhr7_5nqTjBA09hExyWOdM0gyQAvuOhGFb8XwbivA%40mail.gmail.com.
