Yes, I think that's still the best approach.

Sam

On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 4:47 PM Nate Griswold <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello. Ran into some problems with typed racket and define-cstruct when 
> adding typed racket layer on top of my ffi bindings.
>
> Is this (https://github.com/racket/typed-racket/issues/766) still the 
> recommended way of working around the issue?
>
> Nate
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAM-xLPoRnfw%3DEwLQjq2Qwqhc56Mx5bZ7wyeaXWD1GWeN3mwG5w%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAK%3DHD%2BZf5E0XSoAMCLoccef5dtG7%3DjXEPD%2BUvLjsaLgP_M1ArQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to