Just in case (not sure how relevant this is to you): https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/Sandboxed_Evaluation.html?q=with-limits#%28form._%28%28lib._racket%2Fsandbox..rkt%29._with-limits%29%29 Works pretty well, but there are some caveats: if an object can be reached outside of the `with-limits` scope, it's not counted.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:42 PM George Neuner <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 7/23/2020 8:30 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > > “If you could have a wish granted, what would you like to see next in > > Racket?” > > > > > https://www.reddit.com/r/Racket/comments/hwe49b/if_you_could_have_a_wish_granted_what_would_you/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf > > or [original > > twitter](https://twitter.com/racketlang/status/1286020900660404232?s=20) > > > > SIMD ops. !!! > > Limits on resources used by individual VMs. ulimit works only at the > process level (so only indirectly affects in-process "thread" places), > and Windows has no simple equivalent: I am aware of Windows "job > objects", but there are no user controls for them. > > > George > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/8b3d3265-616d-e93e-4cd3-01b3ca91a474%40comcast.net > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CABNTSaELD1rHr3_dBw61KkLYzo5x%2B68WOywAG7AMDGC7ffrLGg%40mail.gmail.com.
