Den tir. 21. jul. 2020 kl. 17.45 skrev Shriram Krishnamurthi < [email protected]>:
> How I can combine these three? I want to do something like this: > > (define n (make-base-namespace)) > (define p (build-path f)) > (eval `(require ,p) n) > > Racket doesn't like that: bad syntax for require sub-form because p is a > path-typed value. > > Essentially, I want to inject the module at f into n so that the provided > identifiers of f are visible inside n. (I haven't been able to get > dynamic-require working either, nor is it an entirely satisfactory > solution because I may not always know what names f is providing.) > Sounds like a job for `namespace-require` with a require spec of the form `(file ,(path->string (build-path f)))`. /Jens Axel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CABefVgzwBhd%3D27JCRr3PDj5NKL8iukiQCsEspww%2BTBcPBUe4dQ%40mail.gmail.com.
