I'm not sure how it could be in `dynamic-require` itself, as opposed to a library that is loaded by `dynamic-require`, but it sounds like a bug at some level. Can you provide a small example?
At Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:03:41 -0500, Nate Griswold wrote: > Sam, thanks > > To be clear, this crash happened DURING a dynamic-require and judging by > the stack trace looked to be part of the dynamic-require machinery (and > this seems to depend on the installation name). > > I actually wasn't depending on anything but racket/base, so i don't believe > anything i was using was causing a separate dependency on promise. > > Nate > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 9:32 AM Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > My guess, not having looked further than your email, is that when you > > don't include racket/promise, something is supplying a promise to something > > else but there are two different instantiations of the promise library, > > causing the force call from one not to recognize the promise from the > > other. Then force just becomes the identity function, and passes through a > > promise to somewhere that isn't expecting one. > > > > Is it possible that some library you're using features promises? > > Alternatively, it might be that the embedding code needs an explicit > > dependency on promises. > > > > Sam > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020, 10:18 AM Nate Griswold <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hello. > >> > >> I noticed something and was wondering what the list thinks: > >> > >> I am using an embedded racket Ics) and i noticed that if i embed a file > >> and don't include any libraries (for a very bare bones c file) i have > >> problems with a crash on a promise on any dynamic-require: > >> > >> build-path: contract violation > >> expected: (or/c path-string? path-for-some-system? 'up 'same) > >> given: #<promise:config:installation-name> > >> > >> but if i do a (require racket/promise) in my rkt argument to --c-mods OR > >> if i do a ++lib racket/promise i get no crash. > >> > >> So is this expected behavior? Should racket/promise always be included or > >> no? And what exactly is going on under the hood here? > >> > >> Nate > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> "Racket Users" group. > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > >> email to [email protected]. > >> To view this discussion on the web visit > >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAM-xLPpg_0Ef8ByjS01Y1pKEeeFMVkF > k3dvGcdpRaYo3ZqDb9A%40mail.gmail.com > >> > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAM-xLPpg_0Ef8ByjS01Y1pKEeeFMVk > Fk3dvGcdpRaYo3ZqDb9A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > >> . > >> > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAM-xLPpaOSxvPEDYzmkAXdFg%2BLTMA > H1mw57kJt7%3DCe6ipXmXDw%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20200713112340.24e%40sirmail.smtp.cs.utah.edu.
