If this were the case I don't think that I'd be having problems replicating it.
________________________________________ From: Serguei Sokol <serguei.so...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2025 9:21 AM To: and...@robbinsa.me <and...@robbinsa.me>; R Package Development <r-package-devel@r-project.org> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] gcc-asan replication for armadillo Le 21/05/2025 à 14:48, andrew--- via R-package-devel a écrit : > Hi all, > > I'm currently having difficulty replicating an ODR violation that is being > raised by the gcc-asan check here: > https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/memtests/gcc-ASAN/RcppPlanc/00install.out. > Perhaps weirder, it seems to be triggered by an inclusion of > armadillo_bits/constants.hpp in both my shared object and the Rcpp binding > library-which seems like something that shouldn't be raising any issues. Seemingly, yes. ODR stands for _One_ Definition Rule so if you define the same thing in two different libs then raising issue sounds legitimate. I suppose one possible solution could be incorporating the content of libnmflib.so (and all other libs your build) directly in RcppPlanc.so and cleaning them afterward. Hoping it helps, Serguei. > > Dirk, you wouldn't happen to have seen this before? > > -Andrew Robbins > ______________________________________________ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
