В Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:27:34 -0400 Ben Bolker <bbol...@gmail.com> пишет:
> Weirdly, I can't get this to fail on my local system even if I > remove rstan -- maybe rstan needs to be present for brms at install > time but not at runtime ... ??? I'm noticing that despite broom.mixed having Suggests: rstan and it being seemingly unable to load, you don't get a NOTE for the missing dependency: >> checking package dependencies ... NOTE >> Packages suggested but not available for checking: 'dotwhisker', >> 'glmmADMB' At that stage, R CMD check verifies that at least one of the libraries contains file.path(PACKAGE_NAME, 'DESCRIPTION'). Later, something else needs a valid rstan/Meta/package.rds. (There are also tests for links between help pages, but they don't stop the check.) While running the tests, methods:::.requirePackage actually tries to load the namespace using require() -> ... -> loadNamespace(), which fails. > Weirdly, I can't get this to fail on my local system even if I > remove rstan -- maybe rstan needs to be present for brms at install > time but not at runtime ... ??? Having only the following files left from a valid 'rstan' installation, I can make R CMD check broom.mixed_0.2.9.5.tar.gz reach the same error as you're getting: rstan rstan/Meta rstan/Meta/package.rds rstan/DESCRIPTION Something must have happened on the Fedora machine. -- Best regards, Ivan ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
