Thanks all for your answers. I resubmitted last week and the package is back on CRAN :)
El El dom, 16 oct 2022 a las 18:34, Hadley Wickham <[email protected]> escribió: > I’d suggest resubmitting, after ensuring that R CMD check runs without > any notes, warnings, or errors. > > Hadley > > > On Monday, October 10, 2022, Diego Hernangómez Herrero < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> I have some doubts on how to proceed in this case. I am the developer of >> tidyterra, and I received an email from CRAN on 23Sep2022 about an issue >> on >> the package, setting a deadline on 07Oct2022 to correct it. >> >> I sent a patch that was accepted on CRAN on 29Sep2022, that fixed the >> issue >> (or at least I am pretty sure I solved it). I received no further feedback >> by CRAN, so I assumed the package was safe. However it was finally >> archived >> on 07Oct2022. >> >> I have already sent an email to CRAN in order to check if they think the >> issues still persist (or maybe they missed the patch submission?), but I >> am >> in a rush since there are other packages that depend on tidyterra and they >> may be in risk of being archived on CRAN as well. >> >> So my question is: What is the best way forward at this point? Should I >> wait to get some feedback from CRAN or is it best to resubmit the package >> (I already have a new patch prepared)? I acknowledge that "The time of >> the >> volunteers is CRAN’s most precious resource" so my goal is to reduce their >> burden as much as possible. >> >> Kind regards >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Have a nice day! >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >> > > > -- > http://hadley.nz > -- Have a nice day! [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
