Adelchi,
I have a similar situation where I had made all of the typical academic
references within the code and documentation for a small but important function
my package uses. I was asked by the CRAN reviewers to add the author of that
function to the DESCRIPTION Authors@R section. I added the following:
person("Terry", "Therneau", role = c("aut”))
Mark
R. Mark Sharp, Ph.D.
Data Scientist and Biomedical Statistical Consultant
7526 Meadow Green St.
San Antonio, TX 78251
mobile: 210-218-2868
[email protected]
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Adelchi Azzalini <[email protected]>
> Subject: [R] a question of etiquette
> Date: June 1, 2020 at 11:34:00 AM CDT
> To: [email protected]
>
> The new version of a package which I maintain will include a new function
> which I have ported to R from Matlab.
> The documentation of this R function indicates the authors of the original
> Matlab code, reference to their paper, URL of the source code.
>
> Question: is this adequate, or should I include them as co-authors of the
> package, or as contributors, or what else?
> Is there a general policy about this matter?
>
> Adelchi Azzalini
> http://azzalini.stat.unipd.it/
>
> ______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
