Thank you for the clarification regarding roxygen2, it does look like a
confounding issue.

I will try to resolve the paths in the tex.

Thank you for the help.

On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 11:39 AM Iñaki Ucar <iu...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:

>
>
> El sáb., 30 nov. 2019 16:22, Yoni <yon...@gmail.com> escribió:
>
>> Thank you for the clarification.
>>
>> I am then more confused.
>>
>> The CRAN version of the package (texPreview) has been unchanged since Oct
>> 23, at which point it was passing the checks with no errors.
>>
>
> If your package is sitting on CRAN since then, and in fact I see in your
> DESCRIPTION that you generated the docs with roxygen2 6.1.1, then the
> roxygen2 update has nothing to do with your check error. You run roxygen2;
> CRAN doesn't.
>
> Iñaki
>


-- 
Yoni

You do not learn to swim from books and lectures on the theory of buoyancy
(Box 1990)

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Reply via email to