Thank you for the clarification regarding roxygen2, it does look like a confounding issue.
I will try to resolve the paths in the tex. Thank you for the help. On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 11:39 AM Iñaki Ucar <iu...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > El sáb., 30 nov. 2019 16:22, Yoni <yon...@gmail.com> escribió: > >> Thank you for the clarification. >> >> I am then more confused. >> >> The CRAN version of the package (texPreview) has been unchanged since Oct >> 23, at which point it was passing the checks with no errors. >> > > If your package is sitting on CRAN since then, and in fact I see in your > DESCRIPTION that you generated the docs with roxygen2 6.1.1, then the > roxygen2 update has nothing to do with your check error. You run roxygen2; > CRAN doesn't. > > Iñaki > -- Yoni You do not learn to swim from books and lectures on the theory of buoyancy (Box 1990) [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel