On 11 November 2019 at 16:17, Daniel Sjoberg wrote: | Awesome, I'll check it out. I do like the HTML vignettes, so I am hoping I | can get it working in that format!
Well, as I said (but wrote poorly, dropping a "non"): Mark's approach is for pdf. I like as you then get by with Sweave only, hence not depending on anything that could change or break. For html, there is also a solution by Henrik involving his R.rsp package. See eg https://stackoverflow.com/a/24111191/143305 Dirk | On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 1:23 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: | | > | > On 11 November 2019 at 12:44, Daniel Sjoberg wrote: | > | Thank you Ben. That is a great suggestion. While searching for | > | instructions on using pre-compiled vignettes, I came across a few posts | > | recommending the dependency package be stored in a drat repository on | > | GitHub and using the DESCRIPTION `Additional_repositories:` tag to point | > to | > | it. This solution seems easier in my current workflow, so I am going to | > | give that a try first. But if the same problems persist, I am absolutely | > | moving to pre-complied vignettes. | > | > It depends on _how_ you compute your vignette but for pdf vignettes a very | > simple solution is offered by Mark here: | > | > | > https://www.markvanderloo.eu/yaRb/2019/01/11/add-a-static-pdf-vignette-to-an-r-package/ | > | > I have switched a few packages of mine to this scheme. | > | > Of course, if you are after html vignettes then this does apply directly, | > but | > maybe you could still precompute a fancy gt table, take a screenshot and | > just | > include it as an image... | > | > Dirk | > | > -- | > http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | > -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel