Thank you Georgi and Uwe! I've made doubly sure that "examples_and_tests" isn't in my tarball and I've uploaded again to CRAN.
yours Kassel On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 17:07, Uwe Ligges <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: > Or you have been there at the wrong time when we enabled a new check > that was not able to correctly deal with check directories produced > under bi-arch check siutuations. This is fixed for wionbuilder and wil > be fixed in the R sources soon, > Uwe > > > > On 07.06.2019 09:31, Georgi Boshnakov wrote: > > It looks like you get the note when you run the check on the package > directory, rather than on the tarball of the package. Undoubtedly, you > submitted the tarball towinbuilder. develops::check also first builds the > package and then does the flecks on the tarball. > > > > If unwanted files do creep into the tarball, use file.Rbuildignore to > tell the builder not to include them. > > > > > > Georgi Boshnakov > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: R-package-devel [r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf > of Kassel Hingee [kassel.hin...@research.uwa.edu.au] > > Sent: 07 June 2019 05:35 > > To: r-package-devel@r-project.org > > Subject: [R-pkg-devel] checks on CRAN notes 'examples_i386', but checks > elsewhere do not > > > > Hi All, > > > > This is my first time submitting a package to CRAN, and posting here. I > > hope I get everything right. > > > > Checks ran by CRAN for Windows systems generated a note that I don't know > > where to start to solve: > > > > * checking for non-standard things in the check directory ... NOTE > > Found the following files/directories: > > examples_i386 examples_x64 lacunaritycovariance-Ex_i386.Rout > > lacunaritycovariance-Ex_x64.Rout tests_i386 tests_x64 > > > > > > This note was not generated when I uploaded the package directly to > > winbuilder in either release or development versions of R. > > It also wasn't generated when I ran devtools::check() on my own (unix) > computer. > > > > The results of the CRAN check can be seen here for another few days: > > > https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/lacunaritycovariance_1.0-3_20190606_051128/ > > The check log containing the above note is here: > > > https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/lacunaritycovariance_1.0-3_20190606_051128/Windows/00check.log > > The package source can bee seen here: > > https://github.com/kasselhingee/lacunaritycovariance/tree/release > > > > I haven't noticed a solution discussed earlier on this email list and > > web searching gave me no joy. I am hoping you can help! > > > > yours > > Kassel > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
