Hi:
The official instructions for writing an R package (https://cran.r-project.
org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html) states, in part,
"The mandatory ‘Maintainer’ field should give a *single* name followed by a
*valid* (RFC 2822) email address in angle brackets.... For a CRAN package
it should be a *person*, not a mailing list and not a corporate entity: do
ensure that it is valid and will remain valid for the lifetime of the
package."
It seems like user feedback for a package (e.g. bug reports and feature
requests) to the maintainer would best be provided in terms of issues
opened in an issue tracking system rather than an email sent to a "person,
not a mailing list". A prominent example is Github issue tracking, where
the Github repository for the issues could be the same issue.
Is there an accepted approach among R package authors to direct users of a
package to an issue tracking system?
Thank you,
Bruce Hoff
Sage Bionetworks
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
