Well, not running an examples because of an error is a bad idea, you
should fix the issue that caused the error first.
And when I meant you should make available package and check log I meant
the version where you did not hide the problems.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 18.05.2017 10:55, dharmapal burne wrote:
Respected Sir/Ma'am.
I have checked Description file and man files. In the description field,
only text is there but not my name or my PC name.
I am not getting errors while checking as cran.
But unfornutately, automated checking at CRAN generating errors
especially in example section.
I have modified the example section to avoid that error (I have used
dontrun\{}).
This is my 00check.log content:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* using log directory ‘/home/vvlab/Desktop/pflMA_1.0.4/plfMA.Rcheck’
* using R version 3.0.2 (2013-09-25)
* using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
* using session charset: UTF-8
* checking for file ‘plfMA/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
* checking extension type ... Package
* this is package ‘plfMA’ version ‘1.0.4’
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... OK
Maintainer: ‘Dhammapal Bharne <dhammap...@uohyd.ac.in
<mailto:dhammap...@uohyd.ac.in>>’
* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for executable files ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
* checking whether package ‘plfMA’ can be installed ... OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package directory ... OK
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking top-level files ... OK
* checking for left-over files ... OK
* checking index information ... OK
* checking package subdirectories ... OK
* checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies
... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking loading without being on the library search path ... OK
* checking dependencies in R code ... OK
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
* checking replacement functions ... OK
* checking foreign function calls ... OK
* checking R code for possible problems ... OK
* checking Rd files ... OK
* checking Rd metadata ... OK
* checking Rd line widths ... OK
* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
* checking Rd contents ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
* checking examples ... OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think, there are no errors now.
Shall I resubmit the tar file to CRAN?
Thank you.
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Uwe Ligges
<lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de
<mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> wrote:
On 18.05.2017 09:07, dharmapal burne wrote:
The name is automatically getting generated after executing the
command
"R CMD build plfMA".
It is my system name.
I think, we should consider it as false positive.
Your system name should not be spell checked, perhapos you provide
check log and package on some web resources so that poeple are able
tpo help?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Uwe Ligges
<lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de
<mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
<mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de
<mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>>> wrote:
On 17.05.2017 16:34, michel.grze...@inrs.fr
<mailto:michel.grze...@inrs.fr>
<mailto:michel.grze...@inrs.fr
<mailto:michel.grze...@inrs.fr>> wrote:
The spell checking of the DESCRIPTION file of my package
have
issued a
NOTE concerning authors' name of articles appearing in the
"description"
field.
Is there a a way to fix this problem or shall I consider
this
NOTE as a
false positive?
I was not able to find any indication in "Writing R
Extension"
about how
to include names in the "description" field.
If the spell checks have false positives, that's OK and your
package
won't be rejected.
Nevertheless, software names should be written single quotes as
'package' and functions with parentheses as in foo().
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Best,
Michel
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>
<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>> mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>>
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>
<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>>
mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>>
--
Best,
*DHAMMAPAL BHARNE,
*
PhD Research Scholar,
*University of Hyderabad,
*
Mobile: 91 9492274285
--
Best,
*DHAMMAPAL BHARNE,
*
PhD Research Scholar,
*University of Hyderabad,
*
Mobile: 91 9492274285
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
