On 06.04.2016 18:26, Pedro Aphalo wrote:
Hello, At the moment three of my CRAN packages are reporting a NOTE. Although reported as a NOTE they are errors triggered by yesterday's update to 'lubridate'.
Right, it was my fault not looking carefully enough at reverse check results - and of course the origibal package maintainer should havbe looked in advanced anyway. I wrote him a message earlier this day asking to fix on his end or send you an email.
In reality only one of the packages needs to be updated to resolve the problems in the three packages. I am getting ready to submit an updated version of package 'photobiology' to solve the problem. My doubt is it worthwhile to increase the version number of the two packages that depend on it, even they do not need any code changes only changing in the version number in the import of 'photobiology'? or is it abusing of CRAN's admins patience?
Please only fix the one that needs fixing, all other do not need to be changed then.
Best, Uwe Ligges
Best regards, Pedro.
______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
