On 26.01.2016 20:03, Adah Zhang wrote:
Hello,
I am running R CMD check (and also with the --as-cran flag), which results
in all OK's in my 00check.log. However, after submitting the package, the
CRAN reviewer tells me of a warning/error regarding one of my examples
(which is easily fix-able if I got the warning myself).
How do I ensure that all warnings, errors, and notes are addressed if I do
not receive these when running the standard checks or when testing the
examples myself? Is there a standard order of commands that a CRAN reviewer
goes through aside from 'R CMD check'?
The reviewer uses a recent version of R-devel (i.e. a daily built), a
recent set of packages (i.e. run update.packages() first) and then
R CMD check --as-cran (well, at least similar, but you will get the
warnings you talk about if you do that, as I already told you when you
asked CRAN).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks,
Adah
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
