John, Steve, thank you for answering my post! On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 20:55, Steve Lianoglou <mailinglist.honey...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I think I lost the reference email somewhere, but: > >> Not only is the sequential foreach much slower than the simple >> for-loop (as least in this particular instance), but I am not quite >> sure how to make foreach run parallel. Where would I get this parallel >> backend? I looked at doMC and doRedis, but these do not run on >> Windows, as far as I understand. > > See this blog post: > http://www.r-statistics.com/tag/dosmp/ > > -- > Steve Lianoglou > Graduate Student: Computational Systems Biology > | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center > | Weill Medical College of Cornell University > Contact Info: http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos/contact >
-- Famous Oxymorons: Jobless Recovery Jumbo Shrimp War Game Wedding Party Genuine Replica Toxic Assets Italian Government Feminine Logic Amicable Divorce Military Intelligence Money Multiplier Fiscal Conservative Abundant Poverty Educated Investor Government Worker Green Shoots Hope and Change Change you can believe in Becky Quick ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
