Bert Gunter <gunter.berton <at> gene.com> writes:
>
> Inline below.
>
> -- No.
> f <- function(x, y = x)x+y ## lazy evaluation enables this
> > f(2)
> [1] 4
> > f(2,3)
> [1] 5
Ok, obviously I was not very precise about what I'd like to do. Sorry. I'm
aware of this functionality. But I'd like to use the same idea for existing
function. Take biplot as an example. There you have an argument
called 'choices' controlling which components you'd like to plot. The standard
labels of the axis are the names of the two chosen components, PC1 and PC2
say. If one wants to add the explained variance to the axis notation, one
could provide the xlab argument:
biplot(pca-object, xlab=paste("PC1", explained.variance.by.pc1))
This works out well, and serves it purpose sufficiently. If it happens that
you'd like to choose different components, you have to provide the choices
argument. As a consequence you have to change your manually adjusted axis
notation as well. Hence, I was wondering, if one could do it in a somewhat
more automatic fashion:
biplot(pca-object, xlab=paste("PC", choices[1], explained.varaiance.by(choices
[1]))
I've to admit that this is an academic question, because at the time you call
biplot, you know which components you want to plot. Thus, you could use the
right values for choices and the labs. But I'm interested whether it can be
done by telling R that it should evaluate choices[1] not at the prompt level,
but at the moment it enters the function biplot, where choices will be known
in any case (since it has default values).
Just to make it clear once again, I'm aware of the possibilities to get this
specific task done. But I'm in particular interested, wheter it could be done
using R's lazy evaluation mechanism.
BR, Thorn
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
