On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Rob Steele <freenx.10.robste...@xoxy.net> wrote: > These are the ways that occur to me. > > ## This produces a logical vector, which will get converted to a numeric > ## vector the first time a number is assigned to it. That seems > ## wasteful. > x <- rep(NA, n) > > ## This does the conversion ahead of time but it's still creating a > ## logical vector first, which seems wasteful. > x <- as.numeric(rep(NA, n)) > > ## This avoids type conversion but still involves two assignments for > ## each element in the vector. > x <- numeric(n) > x[] <- NA > > ## This seems reasonable. > x <- rep(as.numeric(NA), n) > > Comments?
My intuition would be to go with the third method (allocate a numeric vector then assign NA to its contents) but I haven't tested the different. In fact, it would be difficult to see differences in, for example, execution time unless n was very large. This brings up a different question which is, why do you want to consider this? Are you striving for readability, for speed, for low memory footprint, for "efficiency" in some other way? When we were programming in S on machines with 1 mips processors and a couple of megabytes of memory, such considerations were important. I'm not sure they are quite as important now. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
