Hao Cen wrote:
Hi Duncan,
Thanks for your reply. I am not sure what you meant by "tell your C
function to use the memory that R sent to it". What R can pass to C is a
pointer to an array and the array size, assuming we are taking about the
.C mechanism. Did you mean my C function takes that array pointer and
generate the required matrix along the length of the array? If this is not
what you meant, would you please give me a small example?
Yes, that is what I meant.
Duncan Murdoch
Jeff
On Thu, November 12, 2009 6:53 pm, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 12/11/2009 6:45 PM, Hao Cen wrote:
Hi,
I have C code to produce a lot of matrices to be analyzed. As these
matrices are large (> 1000*10000) and are a lot (> 1000), I am thinking
about how to pass them from C to R effectively.
Would you think about the following solution? In R, I create a wrapper
function
passDataFromCToR = function(row, col) { mat = matrix(0, row, col)
.C("passDataFromCToR",mat)[[1]]
That .C call doesn't match the header of the function below: you didn't
pass row and col.
}
It wraps the following C function
void passDataFromCToR (double *m, int *row, int* col){ mymat = f() // my
c function to produce a matrix // then I copy mymat to m element by
element via a loop
}
Then to use these functions, I would write in R
mat = passDataFromCToR(1000, 10000)
Two issues with this approach are that 1) I have to copy the data once
and 2)to the worse, in R I have to know the dimension of the matrices to
be passed from C. This information is not always available.
Why would you have to copy the data? Just tell your C function to use
the memory that R sent to it, instead of copying entries into it. (R may
be doing a copy when you extract the results, though.)
If your C code can't use memory provided to it, then there are no simple
ways to avoid copying. The complicated way is to use the .Call interface
instead of .C. There are examples in Writing R Extensions. They *will*
require modifications to your code if it can't take a pointer to the
memory to use.
For the question of the dimensions being unknown in advance: Just write
two functions. The first does the calculations up to the point where it
needs the memory, the second works on an appropriately sized array, that
your R code allocated based on the first result. Or use the .Call()
interface.
Duncan Murdoch
I would appreciate if you share with me your thoughts on how to solve
this problem better.
thanks
Jeff
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
