tdm wrote: >> OK, I think I've figured it out, the predict of lrm didn't seem to pass >> it through the logistic >> function. If I do this then the value is similar to that of lm. Is this >> by design? Why would it >> be so?
Please take some time to read the help files on these functions so that you at least understand that they fit different models. ?Design:::lrm ?Design:::predict.lrm ?Design:::datadist ?lm This really is just a plainer way of saying what I said before. HTH, Mark. tdm wrote: > > > OK, I think I've figured it out, the predict of lrm didn't seem to pass it > through the logistic function. If I do this then the value is similar to > that of lm. Is this by design? Why would it be so? > > 1 / (1 + Exp(-1 * 3.38)) = 0.967 > > > tdm wrote: >> >> >> Anyway, do you know why the lrm predict give me a values of 3.38? >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Logistic-and-Linear-Regression-Libraries-tp26140248p26141711.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
