On 10/25/2009 03:43 PM, mau...@alice.it wrote:
I can define a list containing NULL elements:

myList<- list("aaa",NULL,TRUE)
names(myList)<- c("first","second","third")
myList
$first
[1] "aaa"
$second
NULL
$third
[1] TRUE
length(myList)
[1] 3

However, if I assign NULL to any of the list element then such
element is deleted from the list:

myList$second<- NULL
myList
$first
[1] "aaa"
$third
[1] TRUE
length(myList)
[1] 2
#
myList$first<- NULL
myList
$third
[1] TRUE
length(myList)
[1] 1

Instead vectors cannot include NULL element:

vec<- c(TRUE,NULL,FALSE)
vec
[1]  TRUE FALSE
length(vec)
[1] 2
vec[1]<- NULL
Error in vec[1]<- NULL : replacement has length zero

Is the above shown behaviour of list data structures to be expected ?
I took me a lot of sweat to figure out this wierd behaviour was the cause of a 
bug
in my big program.
In general, if I have a list with some elements initialized to NULL, that can 
be changed
dynamically, then how can I reinitialize such elements to NULL without deleting 
them
from the list ?

Hi Maura,
As Patrick indicated, you can assign NULL to an existing element of a list with:

mylist[2]<-list(NULL)

but only with the single bracket extractor. If you try this:

mylist$second<-list(NULL)
#OR
mylist[[2]]<-list(NULL)

you will get the unexpected result of the element becoming a list with a component that is NULL. This also happens if you try to add a new element:

mylist[4]<-list(NULL)

is okay, but:

mylist[[4]]<-list(NULL)
#OR
mylist$fourth<-list(NULL)

lands you in the same pickle. The single bracket extractor gets you the list component, but the double brackets or the equivalent extraction by name gets you what is _in_ that component. Instead of "make this list component contain NULL" the command is saying "make this list component contain a list that contains NULL". When you just assign NULL, it is like saying "make this component of the list NULL" (i.e. not there).

A vector is atomic, all components must be of the same data type. So any _something_ (e.g. numeric, character, logical) is not the same as _nothing_ (NULL). The concatenation function, when confronted with two somethings separated by a nothing, simply drops the nothing.

Jim

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to