Paul Murrell wrote:
Hi

If using integer indices is awkward, you could push a viewport tree with the relevant viewports given useful names. Then you can downViewport() using the names (if those plots are lattice plots, then you might even be able to use the 'draw.in' argument). Is that the sort of thing you are looking for?

Actually no, integer is just fine, and querying viewports by name would be slower, no?. I more wanted to confirm that my approach was sound, using lapply and loops, and that I was using as much of the grid vectorizing features that were available. For instance, a few iterations ago I attempted to construct what I thought was a vector of viewports like so:

x <- c(2,4,2,4)
y <- c(2,2,4,4)
print(...,vp=viewport(layout.pos.col=x,layout.pos.row=y)

which would print ... to each viewport. I realize now that specifying a vector for layout.pos.* args is just to construct one larger viewport of the adjacent viewports, right?

Thanks for the quick feedback!

Jeff

Paul


Jeff Horner wrote:
Hi,

I recently created a function which uses grid with a viewport constructed with grid.layout() to position four plots on a plot device. My question is what's the best way to programatically traverse each element of the viewport?

The grid is 5x5 and the four plots occupy positions (2,2), (4,2), (2,4), and (4,4).

Here's the viewport code:

  pushViewport(
         viewport(
             layout=grid.layout(
                 nrow=5,
                 ncol=5,
                 widths=unit(
                     c(margin[2],1,margin[6],1,margin[4]),
                     c('npc','null','npc','null','npc')),
                 heights=unit(
                     c(margin[3],1,margin[5],1,margin[1]),
                     c('npc','null','npc','null','npc'))
             )
         )
     )

margin is a numeric vector of length 6 which resp defines the bottom, left, top, right, horizontal, and veritical margins (the cross hairs between the 4 plots). This is to allow the user to define how much margin should exist around all plots and between the plots.

I then use lapply to visit only those viewports to place the plots by specifying an x and y vector like so:

x <- c(2,4,2,4)
y <- c(2,2,4,4)
i <- 1
lapply(list(plot1,plot2,plot3,plot4),function(j){
    print(j,vp=viewport(layout.pos.col=x[i],layout.pos.row=y[i])
    i <<- i + 1
})

Looks kludgey. Is there a better way?

Also, I created debug code to visit those viewports where *nothing* is supposed to be printed except for a grey box with black edges:

z <- outer(logical(5),logical(5),"==")
for (i in 1:length(x)) z[x[i],y[i]] <- FALSE
for (i in 1:5){
    for (j in 1:5){
       if (z[i,j])
          grid.rect(gp=gpar(fill="grey"),
            vp=viewport(layout.pos.col=i,layout.pos.row=j))
    }
}

This looks kludgey as well. Any other ways outer there that are more elegant?

Thanks,

Jeff

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to