On 14/09/2009 7:44 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
Apologies for the missing data. It can be downloaded from here (22Kb):
http://www.squaregoldfish.co.uk/sekrett/series.csv

The dataset is 97% missing values. I suspect what you're seeing is what the man page describes as follows:

"If the na.action function passes through missing values (as na.pass does), the covariances are computed from the complete cases. This means that the estimate computed may well not be a valid autocorrelation sequence,"

Duncan Murdoch


Steve.

Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 14/09/2009 6:40 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
Hi list,

I've been producing autocorrelation functions of time series using the
acf function, and have found a series or two for which correlations of >
1 are given, which I think shouldn't happen.

Attached is the time series I'm using, and below is the R code (version
2.9.1) that I'm entering:

series <- read.csv("series.csv")
corr <- acf(series, lag.max=90, na.action=na.pass, plot=T)

The first few values of corr are below:

0   1.000
1   1.258
2   1.192
3   1.266
4   0.864
5   0.637

The entries of concern are 1-3 - surely these results are invalid?

I'd be grateful if you could shed any light on this for me.

Your data file didn't show up.  (Some attachments are stripped; it's
better to include data inline.)

Duncan Murdoch



------------------------------------------------------------------------

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to