Thank you very much for those useful informations. I've been reading some papers and actually different people will use different ordination methods also if the studies are very alike. So I will keep metaMDS for the moment and see if my results are interpretable :)
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Confusion-metaMDS-and-CA-tp25274426p25295956.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
