You followed only the ones you thought were important, but failed...
a) to reduce the problem to a reproducible form (and gave no evidence
of even trying to do so.) and failed ...
b) to read the helpful reply you got from Jim, which I suspect
contained the answer, and now ...
c) persist in thinking you actually followed the guidelines.
furrfu
--
DW
On Aug 5, 2009, at 2:36 PM, waltzmiester wrote:
Um I still followed the guidelines...
David Winsemius wrote:
On Aug 5, 2009, at 1:22 PM, waltzmiester wrote:
Jim
Settle down, just because you can't understand my post doesn't mean
I didn't
follow the guidlines.
1)The code is commented.
2)The problem in the code is succinct and therefore "minimal" even
though it
cannot be self contained, the user-defined function itself is.
You could for instance have simplified the problem to simply defining
a simple
function outside the loop and then executing it within the loop (and
probably
getting only the result of the last evaluation .... as would be
expected in R.)
3) In order for you to be able to reproduce my code, you would need
to to
install 13 packages and blend in 187 lines of patch code that I
would need
to send you.
Rather than adopt an attitude, why don't you (re-?)read Jim's
comments
carefully
and thoroughly. What happens, for instance, if you wrap print()
around
the Models
call? Or perhaps assign whatever it returns to an enduring object as
an element
of a list?
I meant that it will model (with function Models) the first species
in i,
and will not model any of the others.
-C
jholtman wrote:
What do you mean by "stop"? Is there an error message? What are
you
getting as output? I don't see you saving or printing the output
from
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Models" (whatever that is). PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM,
waltzmiester<cwalt...@shepherd.edu>
wrote:
I am trying to get the function "Models" to work each time there
is an
instance of k. This code will stop after the first model is
complete. I
need
it to come back and pass the next value of c into the
"Initial.State"
function. any ideas?
col<-c(23:28)
#Setup
for(k in col){
Initial.State(Response=zample[,c(k,29)],
Explanatory=zample[,variable_columns],
IndependentResponse=population[,c(k,29)],
IndependentExplanatory=population[,variable_columns])
#Modeling
Models(GLM=T, GAM=T, RF=T, GBM=T, TSS=T, KeepPredIndependent=T)
}
David Winsemius, MD
Heritage Laboratories
West Hartford, CT
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/for-loop-tp24830984p24833941.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
David Winsemius, MD
Heritage Laboratories
West Hartford, CT
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
