Exactly what are you doing and how are you 'sending' in the commands? Are you doing a cut/paste to the RGUI? If so, have you tried 'source'? I use RGUI all the time and have no performance/memory problems with executing scripts; I always 'source' in most of the scripts.
Some more detail on exactly what you are doing in both environments would help to understand your problem. On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 4:34 PM, vinay_rk<radhakrishna.pendy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > This is my first post on this forum and I hope I communicate my problem > correctly. > > I have been using R for sometime and have always used RGUI to send commands > to R. However recently I had to work on large data sets and memory was an > issue. I have started using R terminal and the speed of operations has > improved considerably . > > Is this always the case ? Should one follow as an informal guide line that R > terminal hogs less memory than RGUI. Or Am I witnessing some random behavior > and it doesn't matter which ever interface you use ? > > Thanks in advance for your suggestions > Regards > Vinay > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/R-TERMINAL-Vs-R-GUI-tp24337825p24337825.html > Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > -- Jim Holtman Cincinnati, OH +1 513 646 9390 What is the problem that you are trying to solve? ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
