in terms of the richness of features and ability to handle large data(which is normal in bank), SAS EM should be on top of others. however, it is not cheap. in terms of algorithm, split procedure in sas em can do chaid/cart/c4.5, if i remember correctly.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Carlos J. Gil Bellosta<c...@datanalytics.com> wrote: > Dear R-helpers, > > I had a conversation with a guy working in a "business intelligence" > department at a major Spanish bank. They rely on recursive partitioning > methods to rank customers according to certain criteria. > > They use both SAS EM and Salford Systems' CART. I have used package R > part in the past, but I could not provide any kind of feature comparison > or the like as I have no access to any installation of the first two > proprietary products. > > Has anybody experience with them? Is there any public benchmark > available? Is there any very good --although solely technical-- reason > to pay hefty software licences? How would the algorithms implemented in > rpart compare to those in SAS and/or CART? > > Best regards, > > Carlos J. Gil Bellosta > http://www.datanalytics.com > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > -- ============================== WenSui Liu Blog : statcompute.spaces.live.com Tough Times Never Last. But Tough People Do. - Robert Schuller ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
