Hi,
That's pretty impressive performance, but wait.
Where does this little r come from? And how
does it differ from its big brother?
Regards,
Tena Sakai
tsa...@gallo.ucsf.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org on behalf of Wacek Kusnierczyk
Sent: Wed 4/29/2009 12:49 AM
To: Dieter Menne
Cc: r-h...@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] Newbie R question PART2
Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote:
> Dieter Menne wrote:
>
>>
>> R --vanilla
>>
>> which I like most because of the taste.
>>
>>
>>
>
> once we talk about preferences, here's the version which i like most
> because of (a) least typing, (b) the non-pompous little r:
>
... and (c) superior performance (in this particular case):
> r <<< "cat('foo\n')"
> # foo
>
time (R --silent --no-save <<< "cat('foo\n')")
# 0.296s
time (R --quiet --no-save <<< "cat('foo\n')")
# 0.280s
time (R --slave <<< "cat('foo\n')")
# 0.293s
time (r <<< "cat('foo\n')")
# 0.055s
vQ
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
