Hi, That's pretty impressive performance, but wait. Where does this little r come from? And how does it differ from its big brother?
Regards, Tena Sakai [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] on behalf of Wacek Kusnierczyk Sent: Wed 4/29/2009 12:49 AM To: Dieter Menne Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [R] Newbie R question PART2 Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote: > Dieter Menne wrote: > >> >> R --vanilla >> >> which I like most because of the taste. >> >> >> > > once we talk about preferences, here's the version which i like most > because of (a) least typing, (b) the non-pompous little r: > ... and (c) superior performance (in this particular case): > r <<< "cat('foo\n')" > # foo > time (R --silent --no-save <<< "cat('foo\n')") # 0.296s time (R --quiet --no-save <<< "cat('foo\n')") # 0.280s time (R --slave <<< "cat('foo\n')") # 0.293s time (r <<< "cat('foo\n')") # 0.055s vQ ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
