Below.
Bert Gunter Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics 650-467-7374 -----Original Message----- From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of jimm-pa...@gmx.de Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:08 AM To: r-help@r-project.org Subject: [R] Forcing the extrapolation of loess through the origin Hi all, I'm fitting a line to my dataset. Later I want to predict missing values that exceed the [min,max] interval of my empirical data, therefore I choose surface="direct" for extrapolation. l1<-loess(y1~x1,span=0.1,data.frame(x=x1,y=y1),control=loess.control(surface ="direct")) In my application it is highly important that the fitted line intercepts at the point of origin. Is it possible to do this in R? -- No. Indeed, this appears to me to contradict the nature of loess as a locally adaptive fit. Bert Thanks in advance. Cheers, Torsten -- ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
